Why I started ioprodz.
With the AI shift, almost everything about the industry feels like new ground. The entire market is debating model sizes, context windows, prompts — while the mainstream providers profit handsomely from the token-grinding companies building slop on top of their APIs. Almost nobody is talking about the boring engineering that decides whether an AI feature actually survives production.
After 15+ years shipping real software across IoT, telecom, real estate, and fintech, I'd seen this pattern before — different name, same mistake.
I watched a team I'd mentored years ago ship a polished, production-grade AI feature in under a month — because they already had TDD, CI/CD, and a clean domain model. A competitor down the street, with 3× the engineers, couldn't get theirs out of preview. Same tools. Same models. Different engineering maturity.
I started ioprodz in late 2025 to be the counter-voice: the one that says the boring engineering is the competitive advantage, and that a small team with the right practices outlasts a big team stacking tokens.
The hardest parts — evals, rollback, observability, domain modeling, cost guardrails — are exactly what every AI tutorial skips. That's where engagements live and die.
AI didn't make those practices obsolete. It made them a superpower. Mature engineering culture is the invisible moat that compounds exactly when everyone else is scrambling.
Automate the internal work first — docs, demos, refactors, metrics, code review. That buys your team time to do the one thing AI can't: talk to the people who actually pay them.
Machines ingest feedback, ship aligned changes. The humans on those teams don't write features — they validate, govern, own outcomes, and spend their time with customers. Shortcuts taken now = locked out of that future.
Software engineer, 15+ years. Worked across IoT (home appliances), telecom, real estate, and fintech. Practitioner of DDD, TDD, XP, Conway's Law, fast feedback loops, CI/CD, platform engineering, and DX. Builder of SpecJest (open source) and Polysee — the lab where I stress-test the methodology. Serving Europe / North Africa.
A tailored 30-minute screening. I'll tell you honestly whether your AI product has a vibe-coding problem or an engineering problem — and what the 90-day path looks like if you want to fix it.